<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>JURISPRUDENCE Archivi - Journal du Droit Transnational</title>
	<atom:link href="https://journaldudroittransnational.it/category/current-issue/jurisprudence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>Première revue en langue française consacrée au droit transnational, le Journal du Droit Transnational est l’organe scientifique de l’Institut d’Etudes et de programmes pour la Méditerranée</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2025 07:05:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>it-IT</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Alicia Grace v Mexico: A turning point in shareholder claims for reflective loss?</title>
		<link>https://journaldudroittransnational.it/alicia-grace-v-mexico-a-turning-point-in-shareholder-claims-for-reflective-loss/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gustavo Minervini]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2025 17:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[JURISPRUDENCE n°1-2025]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://journaldudroittransnational.it/?p=967</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Download the PDF Gustavo Minervini 1. Introduction On 19 August 2024, an ICSID-administered tribunal established under the 1976 UNCITRAL Rules rendered a final award in the dispute Alicia Grace v. Mexico. The dispute arose from a series of contracts (‘Oro Negro Contracts’) between Petróleos Mexicanos (‘Pemex’), the Mexican State-owned oil</p>
<p>L'articolo <a href="https://journaldudroittransnational.it/alicia-grace-v-mexico-a-turning-point-in-shareholder-claims-for-reflective-loss/">Alicia Grace v Mexico: A turning point in shareholder claims for reflective loss?</a> proviene da <a href="https://journaldudroittransnational.it">Journal du Droit Transnational</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Note sous l’ordonnance sur la procédure n°3 du 23 février 2024 dans l’affaire CIRDI EMS Shipping &#038; Trading GmbH c. République d’Albanie</title>
		<link>https://journaldudroittransnational.it/note-sous-lordonnance-sur-la-procedure-n3-du-23-fevrier-2024-dans-laffaire-cirdi-ems-shipping-trading-gmbh-c-republique-dalbanie/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karla Lucero Andrade]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2025 17:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[JURISPRUDENCE n°1-2025]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://journaldudroittransnational.it/?p=1044</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Download the PDF Karla Lucero Andrade♣ Mots clés : arbitrage CIRDI, nouveau Règlement d’arbitrage CIRDI 2022, article 44, bifurcation, objections préliminaires. Dans l’arbitrage transnational et en particulier dans l’arbitrage CIRDI, la bifurcation, c’est-à-dire la faculté accordée aux parties en différend de « demander à ce qu’une question soit portée au cours d’une phase</p>
<p>L'articolo <a href="https://journaldudroittransnational.it/note-sous-lordonnance-sur-la-procedure-n3-du-23-fevrier-2024-dans-laffaire-cirdi-ems-shipping-trading-gmbh-c-republique-dalbanie/">Note sous l’ordonnance sur la procédure n°3 du 23 février 2024 dans l’affaire CIRDI EMS Shipping &amp; Trading GmbH c. République d’Albanie</a> proviene da <a href="https://journaldudroittransnational.it">Journal du Droit Transnational</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Case note: United States District Court Eastern District of New York, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Gautam Adani and Sagar Adani and United States District Court Eastern District of New York, United States of America v. Gautam S. Adani,</title>
		<link>https://journaldudroittransnational.it/case-note-united-states-district-court-eastern-district-of-new-york-securities-and-exchange-commission-v-gautam-adani-and-sagar-adani-and-united-states-district-court-eastern-district-of-new-york/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sondra Faccio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2025 17:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[JURISPRUDENCE n°1-2025]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://journaldudroittransnational.it/?p=964</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Download the PDF Sondra Faccio Associate Professor, School of International Studies and Department of Law, University of Trento I. Introduction Gautam Adani and Sagar Adani, respectively founder and controlling shareholder and executive director of the Indian company Adani Green Energy Ltd (Adani Green) are accused by the US Securities and</p>
<p>L'articolo <a href="https://journaldudroittransnational.it/case-note-united-states-district-court-eastern-district-of-new-york-securities-and-exchange-commission-v-gautam-adani-and-sagar-adani-and-united-states-district-court-eastern-district-of-new-york/">Case note: United States District Court Eastern District of New York, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Gautam Adani and Sagar Adani and United States District Court Eastern District of New York, United States of America v. Gautam S. Adani,</a> proviene da <a href="https://journaldudroittransnational.it">Journal du Droit Transnational</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Limbu v Dyson Technology Limited and the forum non conveniens doctrine</title>
		<link>https://journaldudroittransnational.it/limbu-v-dyson-technology-limited-and-the-forum-non-conveniens-doctrine/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redazione]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[JURISPRUDENCE n°1-2024]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://journaldudroittransnational.it/?p=891</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Download the PDF Farah Y Introduction The High Court decision in Limbu v Dyson tests the application of the doctrine of forum non conveniens (‘FNC’) in international human rights litigation for the first time since the UK&#8217;s withdrawal from the EU.1 Until the UK-EU Withdrawal Treaty, the position of the</p>
<p>L'articolo <a href="https://journaldudroittransnational.it/limbu-v-dyson-technology-limited-and-the-forum-non-conveniens-doctrine/">Limbu v Dyson Technology Limited and the forum non conveniens doctrine</a> proviene da <a href="https://journaldudroittransnational.it">Journal du Droit Transnational</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
